2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Buick LaCrosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Buick LaCrosse would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 330 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (312 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (279 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LaCrosse | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Buick | Mini |
Model | LaCrosse | Roadster |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 279 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3758 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1391 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |