2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Buick LaCrosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Buick LaCrosse would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2005 Buick LaCrosse. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2005 Buick LaCrosse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 572 kg more than 2005 Buick LaCrosse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Buick LaCrosse. (312 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Buick LaCrosse.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LaCrosse | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | LaCrosse | XC90 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |