2005 Buick LeSabre vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2005 Buick LeSabre is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 149 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LeSabre | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | LeSabre | Crestline |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2940 mm |