2005 Buick LeSabre vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2005 Buick LeSabre is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2005 Buick LeSabre. (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2005 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 93 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Buick LeSabre | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Buick | Dodge |
| Model | LeSabre | Polara |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2960 mm |
