2005 Buick LeSabre vs. 1967 Toyota Sport 800
To start off, 2005 Buick LeSabre is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Toyota Sport 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Toyota Sport 800 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1967 Toyota Sport 800. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1967 Toyota Sport 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 1049 kg more than 1967 Toyota Sport 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Toyota Sport 800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Toyota Sport 800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Toyota Sport 800. (67 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Toyota Sport 800.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LeSabre | 1967 Toyota Sport 800 | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | LeSabre | Sport 800 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 67 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |