2005 Buick LeSabre vs. 1991 Volvo 960
To start off, 2005 Buick LeSabre is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1991 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1991 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 99 kg more than 1991 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Buick LeSabre | 1991 Volvo 960 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | LeSabre | 960 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2780 mm |
