2005 Buick LeSabre vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2005 Buick LeSabre is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 543 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (126 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Buick LeSabre | 1996 Proton 400 | |
| Make | Buick | Proton |
| Model | LeSabre | 400 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1466 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2510 mm |
