2005 Buick Rainier vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Buick Rainier is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick Rainier (272 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick Rainier weights approximately 925 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick Rainier (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick Rainier | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | Rainier | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 272 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 64 L |