2005 Buick Rainier vs. 2011 Maybach Landaulet
To start off, 2011 Maybach Landaulet is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Buick Rainier would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2011 Maybach Landaulet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Maybach Landaulet (620 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 2005 Buick Rainier. (276 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Maybach Landaulet should accelerate faster than 2005 Buick Rainier.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Maybach Landaulet (999 Nm) has 612 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Buick Rainier. (387 Nm). This means 2011 Maybach Landaulet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Buick Rainier.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Buick Rainier | 2011 Maybach Landaulet | |
| Make | Buick | Maybach |
| Model | Rainier | Landaulet |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 620 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 387 Nm | 999 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 6165 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1981 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1575 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3828 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 110 L |
