2005 Buick Rainier vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Buick Rainier would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick Rainier (276 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-09. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 58 kg more than 2005 Buick Rainier.
Because 2013 Mazda CX-09 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Buick Rainier. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick Rainier (387 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (366 Nm). This means 2005 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick Rainier | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Rainier | CX-09 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 387 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 76 L |