2005 Buick Terraza vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Buick Terraza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Buick Terraza would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick Terraza (200 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (171 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick Terraza should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick Terraza weights approximately 506 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick Terraza (298 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm). This means 2005 Buick Terraza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick Terraza | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Terraza | E-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2028 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 62 L |