2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1946 Citroen 7A
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Citroen 7A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Citroen 7A would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1946 Citroen 7A. (33 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Citroen 7A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 692 kg more than 1946 Citroen 7A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1946 Citroen 7A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac CTS | 1946 Citroen 7A | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | CTS | 7A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1303 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2920 mm |
