2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1948 Studebaker Commander. (94 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1948 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 134 kg more than 1948 Studebaker Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Studebaker |
Model | CTS | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 3703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 111.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3030 mm |