2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1951 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1951 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 70 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1951 Hudson Hornet | |
Make | Cadillac | Hudson |
Model | CTS | Hornet |
Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 4810 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2990 mm |