2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 244 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Cadillac | Humber |
Model | CTS | Pullman |
Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 4085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 120 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.3:1 |
Top Speed | 223 km/hour | 132 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3330 mm |