2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1952 DKW F 89
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 884 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac CTS | 1952 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | CTS | F 89 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
