2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1955 Fiat 1900
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 1900 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1955 Fiat 1900. (79 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 362 kg more than 1955 Fiat 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1955 Fiat 1900 | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | CTS | 1900 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |