2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1960 DAF 600
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 376 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 490 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac CTS | 1960 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | CTS | 600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5663 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 395 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 46 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 65 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 28 L |
