2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1961 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1961 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1012 kg more than 1961 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1961 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | CTS | Elite |
Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 29 L |