2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1961 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1961 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1298 kg more than 1961 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1961 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | CTS | Seven |
Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 29 L |