2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 482 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac CTS | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | CTS | Munga |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 74 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 31 L |
