2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1230 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | CTS | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2060 mm |
