2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1966 Triumph 2000

To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 560 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Cadillac CTS 1966 Triumph 2000
Make Cadillac Triumph
Model CTS 2000
Year Released 2005 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5663 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 395 HP 91 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 536 Nm 158 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99 mm 74.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 76 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1730 kg 1170 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 64 L