2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1968 Jaguar XJ-13
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ-13. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 669 kg more than 1968 Jaguar XJ-13.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 (570 Nm @ 6300 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | CTS | XJ-13 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3175 cc | 4990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1000 mm |