2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep. (68 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep weights approximately 28 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Because 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep. (177 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1970 Mitsubishi Jeep | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | CTS | Jeep |
Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2659 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 177 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2650 mm |