2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1972 Mazda 110 S
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 764 kg more than 1972 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1972 Mazda 110 S | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | 110 S |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2360 mm |