2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1974 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 632 kg more than 1974 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (264 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac CTS | 1974 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | CTS | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 264 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2430 mm |
