2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Century would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1982 Buick Century. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Century.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Buick Century. (197 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Buick Century | |
Make | Cadillac | Buick |
Model | CTS | Century |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 197 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2664 mm |