2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Mini Clubman
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1982 Mini Clubman.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | CTS | Clubman |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2140 mm |