2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 960 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | CTS | 102 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 5663 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2160 mm |