2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Volvo 245
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 1986 Volvo 245. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Volvo 245.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Volvo 245. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | CTS | 245 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5663 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2660 mm |