2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (343 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
Make | Cadillac | Matra-Simca |
Model | CTS | M25 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 363 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |