2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 356 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 2005 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2005 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | CTS | Armadillo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 1850 mm |
