2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Helem. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Helem would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 300 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 58 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (264 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 1997 Renault Helem | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS | Helem |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 510 HP |
Torque | 264 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1650 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |