2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (264 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (153 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac CTS | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | |
| Make | Cadillac | Plymouth |
| Model | CTS | Pronto Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 115 HP |
| Torque | 264 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2650 mm |
