2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 496 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (408 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (300 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Cadillac CTS 2000 Ford Mustang
Make Cadillac Ford
Model CTS Mustang
Year Released 2005 2000
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3175 cc 4601 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 408 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 90.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 89.9 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1794 kg 1298 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2580 mm