2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 2001 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2001 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Subaru Outback (282 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm). This means 2001 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS. 2001 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 2005 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2005 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Cadillac CTS 2001 Subaru Outback
Make Cadillac Subaru
Model CTS Outback
Year Released 2005 2001
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V boxer
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 179 HP 0 HP
Torque 245 Nm 282 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83.2 mm 89.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 80 mm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1590 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2530 mm