2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Lincoln Blackwood
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lincoln Blackwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lincoln Blackwood would be higher. At 5,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Blackwood is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lincoln Blackwood weights approximately 928 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2002 Lincoln Blackwood is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Blackwood will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Blackwood (481 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (343 Nm). This means 2002 Lincoln Blackwood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Lincoln Blackwood | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | CTS | Blackwood |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 5398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 481 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 2520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3530 mm |