2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Peugeot Sesame
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot Sesame. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot Sesame would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (264 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Peugeot Sesame | |
Make | Cadillac | Peugeot |
Model | CTS | Sesame |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 264 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |