2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 2006 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Bluebird. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Bluebird. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 2006 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |