2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox

To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Equinox. (185 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 158 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS.

Because 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (286 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (264 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Cadillac CTS 2008 Chevrolet Equinox
Make Cadillac Chevrolet
Model CTS Equinox
Year Released 2005 2008
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2786 cc 3425 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 264 Nm 286 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1592 kg 1750 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.9 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.4 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 61 L