2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 2008 Chrysler Neon
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (139 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 267 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (264 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (186 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 2008 Chrysler Neon | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | CTS | Neon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 264 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |