2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 102 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (255 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (343 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac CTS | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | CTS | UTE |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |