2005 Cadillac CTS vs. 2012 Fiat Freemont
To start off, 2012 Fiat Freemont is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2012 Fiat Freemont. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2012 Fiat Freemont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Freemont weights approximately 108 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Freemont, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac CTS | 2012 Fiat Freemont | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | CTS | Freemont |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 168 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4887 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2891 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 78 L |
