2005 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 174 kg more than 1949 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac DeVille | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1804 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2850 mm |
