2005 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1968 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DeVille (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1076 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac DeVille (400 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac DeVille | 1968 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | DeVille | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 4563 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 66 L |
