2005 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DeVille (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-9. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 91 kg more than 2005 Cadillac DeVille.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac DeVille (400 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4563 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1927 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |