2005 Cadillac DTS vs. 1963 Ferrari 156
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DTS (287 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1963 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Because 1963 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 1963 Ferrari 156 has manual transmission. 1963 Ferrari 156 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac DTS | 1963 Ferrari 156 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
Model | DTS | 156 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 9500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2330 mm |