2005 Cadillac DTS vs. 1965 DKW F 102
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DTS (287 HP) has 228 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 102. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac DTS (388 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102. 2005 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 1965 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1965 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac DTS | 1965 DKW F 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | DTS | F 102 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2480 mm |