2005 Cadillac DTS vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DTS (287 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145.
Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac DTS (388 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac DTS | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DTS | 145 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2620 mm |